Fellow travellers

One of the aims of our letter is to help make visible the sheer variety of work across the cognitive sciences taking an interactive stance and exploring its implications. Here we offer a growing list of like-minded work (without the implication that all are exactly on the same page). The focus is on programmatic papers and books that can point the interested reader to new empirical and theoretical vistas.

Alač, M., Gluzman, Y., Aflatoun, T., Bari, A., Jing, B., & Mozqueda, G. (2020). Talking to a Toaster: How Everyday Interactions with Digital Voice Assistants Resist a Return to the Individual. Evental Aesthetics, 9(1), 3–53. https://eventalaesthetics.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/EAV9N1_2020_Alac_Toaster_3_53.pdf
Ameka, F. K., & Terkourafi, M. (2019). What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics, S0378216619300268. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.001
Anderson, M. L., Richardson, M. J., & Chemero, A. (2012). Eroding the Boundaries of Cognition: Implications of Embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 717–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01211.x
Bangerter, A., Genty, E., Heesen, R., Rossano, F., & Zuberbühler, K. (2022). Every product needs a process: unpacking joint commitment as a process across species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1859), 20210095. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0095
Bavelas, J. B. (2005). The Two Solitudes: Reconciling Social Psychology and Language and Social Interaction. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., & Healing, S. (2017). Doing mutual understanding. Calibrating with micro-sequences in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 91–112. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.006
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper. Language Learning, 59, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x
Bennett, D., Dix, A., Eslambolchilar, P., Feng, F., Froese, T., Kostakos, V., Lerique, S., & van Berkel, N. (2021). Emergent Interaction: Complexity, Dynamics, and Enaction in HCI. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3441321
Bickhard, M. H. (2007). Language as an interaction system. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(2), 171–187. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.006
Birhane, A. (2017). Descartes was wrong: ‘a person is a person through other persons.’ Aeon. https://aeon.co/ideas/descartes-was-wrong-a-person-is-a-person-through-other-persons
Bolis, D., & Schilbach, L. (2018). ‘I Interact Therefore I Am’: The Self as a Historical Product of Dialectical Attunement. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9574-0
Bottema-Beutel, K. (2017). Glimpses into the blind spot: Social interaction and autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 68, 24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.06.008
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
Buschmeier, H., & Kopp, S. (2018). Communicative listener feedback in human–agent interaction: Artificial speakers need to be attentive and adaptive. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/publication/2916994
Button, G., Coulter, J., Lee, J. R. E., & Sharrock, W. (Eds.). (1995). Computers, minds, and conduct. Polity Press.
Ciaunica, A. (2019). The ‘Meeting of Bodies’: Empathy and Basic Forms of Shared Experiences. Topoi, 38(1), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9500-x
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind: studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. Macmillan.
Cowley, S. J. (Ed.). (2011). Distributed language. John Benjamins Pub. Co.
Cummins, F. (2018). The Ground From Which We Speak: Joint Speech and the Collective Subject. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://cspeech.ucd.ie/Fred/books/CumminsGroundLarge.pdf
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441–447. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009
De Jaegher, H., Peräkylä, A., & Stevanovic, M. (2016). The co-creation of meaningful action: bridging enaction and interactional sociology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1693), 20150378. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0378
Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: the continuity between life and language. The MIT Press.
Dingemanse, M. (2020). Resource-rationality beyond individual minds: the case of interactive language use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, 23–24. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19001638
Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. doi: 10.1515/cog-2014-0024
Dubova, M., Galesic, M., & Goldstone, R. L. (2022). Cognitive Science of Augmented Intelligence. Cognitive Science, 46(12), e13229. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13229
Dumas, G. (2011). Towards a two-body neuroscience. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 4(3), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.4.3.15110
Dumas, G., Lachat, F., Martinerie, J., Nadel, J., & George, N. (2011). From social behaviour to brain synchronization: Review and perspectives in hyperscanning. IRBM, 32(1), 48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.irbm.2011.01.002
Dutilh Novaes, C. (2021). The dialogical roots of deduction: historical, cognitive, and philosophical perspectives on reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, D. (2006). Discourse, cognition and social practices: the rich surface of language and social interaction. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059551
Enfield, N. J. (2013). Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. Oxford University Press.
Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Introduction: Human Sociality as a New Interdisciplinary Field. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and human interaction (pp. 1–35). Berg.
Falandays, J. B., Batzloff, B. J., Spevack, S. C., & Spivey, M. J. (2020). Interactionism in language: from neural networks to bodies to dyads. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(5), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1501501
Fiebich, A., Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. D. (2016). Pluralism, interaction, and the ontogeny of social cognition. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Mind. Routledge.
Fletcher-Watson, S., De Jaegher, H., van Dijk, J., Frauenberger, C., Magnée, M., & Ye, J. (2018). Diversity Computing. Interactions, 25(5), 28–33. doi: 10.1145/3243461
Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2003). Social interaction and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Volume 2) (pp. 119–144). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fowler, C. A. (2013). Talking as doing: Language forms and public language. New Ideas in Psychology. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.007
Froese, T., & Paolo, E. A. D. (2011). The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1075/pc.19.1.01fro
Fusaroli, R., Gangopadhyay, N., & Tylén, K. (2014). The dialogically extended mind: Language as skilful intersubjective engagement. Cognitive Systems Research, 29–30, 31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.06.002
Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2013). Dialogue as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology.
Gallagher, S. (2008). Inference or interaction: social cognition without precursors. Philosophical Explorations, 11(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790802239227
Gallagher, S. (2013). The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 25–26, 4–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.008
Gallotti, M., & Frith, C. D. (2013). Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 160–165. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661313000417
Gentner, D. (2019). Cognitive Science Is and Should Be Pluralistic. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 884–891. doi: 10.1111/tops.12459
Ginzburg, J. (2012). The interactive stance: meaning for conversation. Oxford University Press.
Ginzburg, J., & Poesio, M. (2016). Grammar Is a System That Characterizes Talk in Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938
Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press.
Goody, E. N. (Ed.). (1995). Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Gregoromichelaki, E., Eshghi, A., Howes, C., Mills, G. J., Kempson, R., Hough, J., Healey, P. G. T., & Purver, M. (2022). Language and Cognition as Distributed Process Interactions. Proceedings of SemDial 2022, 12.
Griffiths, D. (2015). Queer Theory for Lichens. UnderCurrents: Journal of Critical Environmental Studies, 19, 36–45. doi: 10.25071/2292-4736/40249