frequency – Mark Dingemanse

Mhmm over time

19 May 2022

Even apparently universal patterns (like the use of ‘mhm’ during tellings) can show important cross-cultural differences. A. Continuers (marked ○) are among the most frequent recipient behaviours in both English and Korean, shown here in four 80 second stretches of tellings. B. However, the relative frequency of continuers is about twice as high in Korean based on 100 random samples of 80 second segments in both languages: on average, 21% of turns are continuers in Korean, against 9% of turns in English (measures expressed this way to control for speech rate differences).

Zipf in conversation

24 April 2022

Frequency/rank distributions of tokenized items (‘words’) and recurring turn formats in conversational corpora with at least 20 such turn formats, representing 22 languages (8 phyla). Tokenized items (blue) show a linear frequency/rank relation in log/log space. Recurring turn formats (whether one-word ○ or multi-word ＋) appear to obey a similar frequency/rank distribution for the 20% of turns that occur >20 times (purple), tapering off towards lower frequencies and unique turns (grey). Fit fluctuates with corpus size and the parallelism of distributions is most apparent in larger corpora.

Probability of encountering repair

24 April 2015

Interactive repair —when people work together to fix trouble in conversation— is quite common. In these 12 languages from around the world, it takes only 84 seconds on average between one repair sequence and the next. The sheer frequency shows how important repair is as a system that keeps conversation on track and helps us negotiate common understanding in a world full of noise. We are united in asking questions.